top of page

How to Justify Flood Resilience Investments Without Waiting for a Disaster

  • Feb 12
  • 4 min read

Flood resilience investments are often shaped in the aftermath of major flood events, when response teams are operating under intense pressure to protect lives, restore services, and support recovery.  


Flood Response

But here is the truth—when it comes to flooding, our memory is short. When the immediate crisis passes, the window to translate lessons learned into long-term resilience investments begins to narrow. In the first 12 months following a major flood, response and recovery funding flows into impacted communities, but understandably, much of it is directed toward urgent repairs and restoration. Communities are stressed, resources are limited, and strategic mitigation planning often takes a back seat. 


Several years later, attention shifts as competing priorities emerge, and flood risk can gradually move down the agenda altogether.  


Ironically, the years with fewer flood events are the hardest time to justify investment, and the most important time to do it. Low-event years create a unique opportunity: space to plan, align stakeholders, secure funding, and make defensible, long-term resilience decisions.  


The challenge is not a lack of awareness or expertise; it’s turning that known risk and lived experience into defensible, fundable business cases, before the next disaster compresses timelines again. 


Flood “Risk Creep” 

When flood events are not making headlines, risk becomes harder to see. Not because it disappears, but because communities are balancing many competing priorities. Housing, transportation, utilities, economic development, fire services, and public safety all require attention and investment. 


At the same time, flood risk continues to evolve through slow but continuous creep in both likelihood and consequence: 

  • Development expands into new areas as the population increases 

  • Infrastructure ages 

  • Catchments change 

  • Weather patterns shift 

  • Sea levels rise 



Risk accumulates quietly, even when impacts are not immediately visible. It can look like a new daycare center built in a low-lying area to meet community demand. A summer camp expanding operations along a river because it’s beautiful and accessible. A nursing home development with ocean views. 


For community development leaders, capital planners, and resilience teams, the challenge is less about understanding flood risk and more about explaining it in ways that hold up in budget discussions, funding applications, and long-term planning, especially when there hasn’t been a recent event to point to. 


Translating Experience into a Strong Business Case 

Emergency managers and resilience leaders understand flood risk deeply through experience. What funding bodies and executive decision-makers often need, however, is clear documentation that connects that experience to measurable impacts such as: 

  • Service disruption and downtime 

  • Evacuation timeframes 

  • Possible loss of life 

  • Community isolation due to road impacts  

  • Asset exposure and damage potential 

  • Revenue loss and recovery costs 

  • Community and economic disruption 


FloodMapp Road Impact Dashboard in Norfolk, VA
FloodMapp's Impact Analytics Dashboard showing impacted roads by severity during a flood event in Norfolk, VA

When flood risk is framed this way, the conversation changes. It moves from a general discussion about risk to a concrete conversation about investment, priorities, and trade-offs. 


FloodMapp helps support that shift, not by replacing professional judgement, but by giving teams defensible evidence of flood impacts to back up what they already know when it’s time to make the case internally or apply for funding. 


Strengthening Funding and Capital Proposals Before the Next Event 

Many resilience and mitigation funding programs, such as NEMA’s Disaster Resilience Funding (DRF), FEMA’s Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG), and state resilience funds, ask agencies to complement narrative justification and professional judgment with documented evidence of risk and benefit.  


FloodMapp strengthens these proposals by helping organizations: 

  • Quantify who and what is exposed 

  • Demonstrate how mitigation reduces long-term costs 

  • Align projects with funding criteria 


In quiet years, this evidence becomes especially valuable. It allows communities to prioritize funding deliberately rather than under the constraints of disaster response timelines, when bandwidth and resources are limited. 


Supporting Utilities and Capital Planning with Better Risk Insight 

For utilities, infrastructure operators, and capital planners, flood resilience isn’t just an emergency management issue. It's a service continuity and asset protection issue.  


Impact-based flood intelligence helps you: 

  • Decide which infrastructure upgrades matter most 

  • Understand which networks and facilities are most exposed 

  • Tie capital investments back to documented risk 

  • Reduce costly, unplanned downtime and emergency repairs 


When organizations have a clear picture of which assets and systems are most vulnerable, they can make smarter investment decisions, ones that protect reliability, public safety, and long-term financial stability. 


FloodMapp product validation in Boston, MA
Real-world flooding on Lewis Street in Boston (January 14, 2024) closely aligned with FloodMapp’s NowCast extent and depth for the same area. Depth is shown from white (shallow) to dark blue (deeper)

FloodMapp’s Role: Supporting Evidence-Based Decisions 

FloodMapp is built to support the expertise that emergency managers, planners, and infrastructure leaders already bring to the table, not replace it.  


Impact-based flood intelligence helps teams turn what they know into documentation that holds up across the organization. This includes: 

  • Translating flood risk into clear, defensible evidence 

  • Supporting funding requests and capital planning decisions 

  • Creating a shared understanding of exposure across departments 

  • Bringing consistency to resilience planning before the next event 

The goal isn’t to change how teams think about flood risk; it’s to give them better tools to communicate it, justify it, and plan around it.  


Quiet Years Are a Rare Opportunity 

Major flood events force rapid decisions and compressed timelines. Quieter years offer something different: time to step back, align priorities, and plan deliberately.  


Communities that use these periods to document risk, pursue funding, and strengthen infrastructure are better positioned when floods return, not because they move faster in the moment, but because the groundwork is already in place.  


Flood resilience is built by carrying lessons learned during response into everyday planning and investment decisions, long before the next storm arrives.  


Explore how flood intelligence can support your resilience planning, funding strategies, and capital investment decisions. Request a demo. 

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page